Assessment Criteria

1. Understanding the assignment:

Excellent - the job demonstrates an accurate understanding of the assignment.
Good - the job demonstrates an accurate understanding of the assignment. Both materials that are directly related to the topic and materials that are not related to it are included.
Satisfactory - materials that are not directly related to the topic are included, the information collected is not analyzed or evaluated by the student.

2. Completion of the task:

Excellent - the material is selected correctly and grouped thematically. The conclusions are reasoned; all materials are directly related to the topic; sources are cited correctly. The work is framed graphically competently.
Good - not all information is taken from reliable sources, some of the information is inaccurate or not directly related to the topic.
Satisfactory - random selection of materials; the information is inaccurate or irrelevant to the topic; incomplete answers to questions; no attempt is made to evaluate or analyze the information.

3. Result of work:

Excellent - clear and logical presentation of information; all information is relevant, accurate, well structured and edited. Demonstrates critical analysis and assessment of the material, the certainty of the position.
Good - the accuracy and structure of information; attractive design of work. Insufficiently expressed their own position and assessment of information.
Satisfactory - the material is not logically structured and is presented outwardly unattractive; no clear answer to the questions posed is given.

4. Creative approach:

Excellent - Various approaches to solving the problem are presented. The work has a strong personality and expresses the point of view of the group.
Good - demonstrates one point of view on the problem; comparisons are made, but no conclusions are drawn.
Satisfactory - information is simply copied from the proposed sources; there is no critical view of the problem; the work has little to do with the theme of the web-quest.